From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: msmith@cbnco.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable rp_filter for IPsec packets
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:41:56 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110314.144156.245399355.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D7E88C7.5080706@cbnco.com>
From: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:29:43 -0400
> David Miller wrote:
>> Secondly, fib_validate_source() already takes too many damn arguments.
>> Find another, less costly, way to pass this information down there.
>
> What would be a less costly way to pass it? Could I just hand it the
> whole skb?
I don't see how passing a pointer is better than passing an interger.
In both cases you're adding an extra argument to the function.
I was trying to get you to think out of the box and come up with
something clever, but that isn't working. :-)
>> Frankly, I think RPF should be disabled completely by default. When
>> it doesn't do anything useful, it's making route lookups twice as
>> expensive as they need to be.
>
> Yeah, it's disabled by default. It's an easy way of preventing
> spoofing of internal source addresses from the Internet, so I like it.
It is not "disabled by default". fib_validate_source() still does a
limited validation of the reverse path, even with the sysctl is set to
zero.
I want it to do absolutely nothing, and instead just use inet_select_addr()
to calculate spec_dst.
Even the spec_dst calculation is spurious, necessary only in limited
situations, and even in that case only takes on special values for
multicast and broadcast addresses.
In short, fib_validate_source() is nothing but completely unnecessary
overhead in the common case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 21:14 [PATCH] Disable rp_filter for IPsec packets Michael Smith
2011-03-14 21:25 ` David Miller
2011-03-14 21:29 ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 21:41 ` David Miller [this message]
2011-03-14 22:11 ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 22:14 ` David Miller
2011-03-14 22:23 ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 22:27 ` David Miller
2011-03-15 23:21 ` Michael Smith
2011-03-15 23:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110314.144156.245399355.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=msmith@cbnco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).