netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: msmith@cbnco.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable rp_filter for IPsec packets
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:41:56 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110314.144156.245399355.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D7E88C7.5080706@cbnco.com>

From: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:29:43 -0400

> David Miller wrote:
>> Secondly, fib_validate_source() already takes too many damn arguments.
>> Find another, less costly, way to pass this information down there.
> 
> What would be a less costly way to pass it? Could I just hand it the
> whole skb?

I don't see how passing a pointer is better than passing an interger.
In both cases you're adding an extra argument to the function.

I was trying to get you to think out of the box and come up with
something clever, but that isn't working. :-)

>> Frankly, I think RPF should be disabled completely by default.  When
>> it doesn't do anything useful, it's making route lookups twice as
>> expensive as they need to be.
> 
> Yeah, it's disabled by default. It's an easy way of preventing
> spoofing of internal source addresses from the Internet, so I like it.

It is not "disabled by default".  fib_validate_source() still does a
limited validation of the reverse path, even with the sysctl is set to
zero.

I want it to do absolutely nothing, and instead just use inet_select_addr()
to calculate spec_dst.

Even the spec_dst calculation is spurious, necessary only in limited
situations, and even in that case only takes on special values for
multicast and broadcast addresses.

In short, fib_validate_source() is nothing but completely unnecessary
overhead in the common case.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-14 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-14 21:14 [PATCH] Disable rp_filter for IPsec packets Michael Smith
2011-03-14 21:25 ` David Miller
2011-03-14 21:29   ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 21:41     ` David Miller [this message]
2011-03-14 22:11       ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 22:14         ` David Miller
2011-03-14 22:23           ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 22:27             ` David Miller
2011-03-15 23:21               ` Michael Smith
2011-03-15 23:35                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110314.144156.245399355.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=msmith@cbnco.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).