From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: msmith@cbnco.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable rp_filter for IPsec packets
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:14:24 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110314.151424.212690587.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D7E928C.1030707@cbnco.com>
From: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:11:24 -0400
> David Miller wrote:
>> I was trying to get you to think out of the box and come up with
>> something clever, but that isn't working. :-)
>
> Yes, I got that, but I don't know what you are looking for, and don't
> expect to succeed by trying something else at random.
Existing arguments might be large enough to carry more than one piece
of information :-)
>> In short, fib_validate_source() is nothing but completely unnecessary
>> overhead in the common case.
>
> I'm not entitled to an opinion about fib_validate_source(). It feels
> like it might be trying to do one too many things. If it were my code
> I might split the RPF out from the spec_dst calculation, move the
> whole lot into net/ipv4/route.c, and only do the fib_lookup() if RPF
> is enabled or CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_CLASSID (i.e. we need to know the itag).
Can't split two two things up, because spec_dst is a product of the
reverse FIB lookup, in the form of FIB_RES_PREFSRC().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 21:14 [PATCH] Disable rp_filter for IPsec packets Michael Smith
2011-03-14 21:25 ` David Miller
2011-03-14 21:29 ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 21:41 ` David Miller
2011-03-14 22:11 ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 22:14 ` David Miller [this message]
2011-03-14 22:23 ` Michael Smith
2011-03-14 22:27 ` David Miller
2011-03-15 23:21 ` Michael Smith
2011-03-15 23:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110314.151424.212690587.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=msmith@cbnco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).