From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: net-next-2.6 status... Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:47:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20110316084739.GD26145@canuck.infradead.org> References: <20110315.160124.104058374.davem@davemloft.net> <20110316065008.GA2780@psychotron.redhat.com> <20110316.000251.189704695.davem@davemloft.net> <20110316073803.GB2780@psychotron.redhat.com> <20110316084022.GA2845@psychotron.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, kaber@trash.net To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110316084022.GA2845@psychotron.brq.redhat.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:40:23AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >What do you suggest? To remove unused flags and leave gaps there or to > >not to remove the flags at all? > > Well, the following comment: > > /* Private (from user) interface flags (netdevice->priv_flags). */ > > leads me to think that these flags should not be used by userspace. > So maybe it may not be problem to change those values. These flags should be moved to linux/netdevice.h