From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Menil <jean-philippe.menil@univ-nantes.fr>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Bug inkvm_set_irq
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:21:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110317082159.GB6459@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D81BF9E.5090503@univ-nantes.fr>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:00:30AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote:
> >>Are you running a preemptible kernel?
> >>Does the following help at all?
> >>
> >>diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> >>index 2ca4535..cdf51c9 100644
> >>--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> >>+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> >>@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work)
> >> * We know no new events will be scheduled at this point, so block
> >> * until all previously outstanding events have completed
> >> */
> >>- flush_work(&irqfd->inject);
> >>+ flush_work_sync(&irqfd->inject);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * It is now safe to release the object's resources
> >>
> >Hi,
> >
> >thanks for the response.
> >
> >root@ayrshire:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i preempt
> ># CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is not set
> >CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
> >CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
> ># CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
> ># CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
> >
> >It does not seem to be a preemptible kernel.
> >
> >I will test tour patch, and report the result.
> >
> >Regards.
> >
> Hi,
>
> i reboot the host with the "flush_work_sync", yesterday at lunchtime.
> I haven't see "Eventfd bug detected" or "Wakeup bug detected" until now.
>
> The modification seem to do the trick.
>
> So, if my understand is correct, flush_work flush the last irqfd,
> but in my case, antoher irqfd was still queued to a cpu?
> Is that right?
>
> Regards.
Yes, it says:
* flush_work - wait for a work to finish executing the last queueing instance
* @work: the work to flush
*
* Wait until @work has finished execution. This function considers
* only the last queueing instance of @work. If @work has been
* enqueued across different CPUs on a non-reentrant workqueue or on
* multiple workqueues, @work might still be executing on return on
* some of the CPUs from earlier queueing.
*
* If @work was queued only on a non-reentrant, ordered or unbound
* workqueue, @work is guaranteed to be idle on return if it hasn't
* been requeued since flush started.
kvm uses the default workqueue which is non-reentrant.
Thanks to Gleb for the suggestion!
--
MST
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-17 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-25 9:07 Bug inkvm_set_irq Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-02-25 10:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-27 17:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-28 8:56 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-02-28 10:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-28 10:40 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-02-28 11:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-28 15:13 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-02-28 22:34 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-01 7:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-01 14:39 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-03 14:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-03 15:26 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-03 15:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-04 9:22 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-04 9:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-04 9:39 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-08 11:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-09 12:28 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-09 13:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-09 13:12 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-09 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-10 8:42 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-15 14:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-15 14:58 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-17 8:00 ` Jean-Philippe Menil
2011-03-17 8:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110317082159.GB6459@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe.menil@univ-nantes.fr \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).