From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Subject: Re: xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm_state
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:46:06 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110320.234606.183056322.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D86F1FD.3080009@cn.fujitsu.com>
From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:36:45 +0800
> Sorry for not said clearly, at the first time I want to do like this.
> But when I grep 'xfrm_init_state', it be used in many place, not
> any pf_key, but also XFRM MIGRATE, ipcomp, ipcomp6. So I did this ugly
> patch by add this to xfrm_init_state() to avoid dup code.
>
> Not sure whether the other case like ipcomp/ipcomp6 etc can cause panic, if
> it panic, maybe we can fix by introduce new xfrm_init_replay() function
> like to assign the default reply function.
> int xfrm_init_replay(struct xfrm_state *x)
> {
> x->repl = &xfrm_replay_legacy;
> return 0;
> }
> and change the orig xfrm_init_replay to xfrm_update_replay()?
> Or dup those code to all used place?
>
> If I was wrong, I will fix this by adding the necessary call to af_key.c.
Ok, thanks for the explanation.
I think there is a simple way out of this:
1) Rename current xfrm_init_state to __xfrm_init_state, add
"bool init_replay" argument. Add the xfrm_init_replay()
call, as in your patch, but conditionalized on this boolean.
2) Implement xfrm_init_state as inline, which calls
__xfrm_init_state(..., true)
3) Replace xfrm_init_state() call in xfrm_user.c with
__xfrm_init_state(..., false)
This seems to avoid all the problems. We don't need to touch every
caller, and we avoid initializing the replay state twice in xfrm_user
Ok?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-21 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-21 5:45 xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm_state Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21 5:48 ` [PATCH] " Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21 5:55 ` David Miller
2011-03-21 6:36 ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21 6:46 ` David Miller [this message]
2011-03-21 6:49 ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21 7:54 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-03-21 7:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21 8:00 ` David Miller
2011-03-21 8:01 ` David Miller
2011-03-21 8:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Wei Yongjun
2011-03-22 1:08 ` David Miller
2011-03-21 8:25 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-03-21 9:10 ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21 9:18 ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21 12:06 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-03-22 1:04 ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-22 13:14 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110320.234606.183056322.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).