netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Subject: Re: xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm_state
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:46:06 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110320.234606.183056322.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D86F1FD.3080009@cn.fujitsu.com>

From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:36:45 +0800

> Sorry for not said clearly, at the first time I want to do like this. 
> But when I grep 'xfrm_init_state', it be used in many place, not
> any pf_key, but also XFRM MIGRATE, ipcomp, ipcomp6. So I did this ugly
> patch by add this to xfrm_init_state() to avoid dup code.
> 
> Not sure whether the other case like ipcomp/ipcomp6 etc can cause panic, if
> it panic, maybe we can fix by introduce new xfrm_init_replay() function
> like to assign the default reply function.
>   int xfrm_init_replay(struct xfrm_state *x)
>   {
>   	x->repl = &xfrm_replay_legacy;
>   	return 0;
>   }
> and change the orig xfrm_init_replay to xfrm_update_replay()? 
> Or dup those code to all used place?
> 
> If I was wrong, I will fix this by adding the necessary call to af_key.c.

Ok, thanks for the explanation.

I think there is a simple way out of this:

1) Rename current xfrm_init_state to __xfrm_init_state, add
   "bool init_replay" argument.  Add the xfrm_init_replay()
   call, as in your patch, but conditionalized on this boolean.

2) Implement xfrm_init_state as inline, which calls
   __xfrm_init_state(..., true)

3) Replace xfrm_init_state() call in xfrm_user.c with
   __xfrm_init_state(..., false)

This seems to avoid all the problems.  We don't need to touch every
caller, and we avoid initializing the replay state twice in xfrm_user

Ok?



  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-21  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-21  5:45 xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm_state Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21  5:48 ` [PATCH] " Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21  5:55 ` David Miller
2011-03-21  6:36   ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21  6:46     ` David Miller [this message]
2011-03-21  6:49       ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21  7:54         ` Steffen Klassert
2011-03-21  7:44       ` [PATCH v2] " Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21  8:00         ` David Miller
2011-03-21  8:01           ` David Miller
2011-03-21  8:37           ` [PATCH v3] " Wei Yongjun
2011-03-22  1:08             ` David Miller
2011-03-21  8:25       ` Steffen Klassert
2011-03-21  9:10         ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21  9:18           ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-21 12:06             ` Steffen Klassert
2011-03-22  1:04               ` Wei Yongjun
2011-03-22 13:14                 ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110320.234606.183056322.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).