From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Amit Salecha <amit.salecha@qlogic.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: LRO disable warnings on kernel 2.6.38
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:34:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110321123406.GA2376@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99737F4847ED0A48AECC9F4A1974A4B80FD10E8429@MNEXMB2.qlogic.org>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:00:31AM -0500, Amit Salecha wrote:
> > Well, this warning can be ignored since these NIC dont receive packets
> > to be forwarded in your setup.
> >
> > I would say netxen_nic_set_flags() is buggy : It rejects data if other
> > flag than ETH_FLAG_LRO is set.
> >
> > if (data & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Brought by commit ef2519b1dd39940 (netxen: fail when try to setup
> > unsupported features) later corrected by commit 97d1935a61b7fe7a65f98f
> > (Make ethtool_ops::set_flags() return -EINVAL for unsupported flags)
> >
> > Since this drivers asserts NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX (mirroring
> > ETH_FLAG_TXVLAN), ethtool_op_get_flags() can return more than
> > ETH_FLAG_LRO.
> >
> > dev_disable_lro() then calls netxen_nic_set_flags() with
> > ETH_FLAG_TXVLAN
> > -> -EINVAL, and ETH_FLAG_LRO stay ORed in dev->features -> WARNING
> >
> >
> Thanks Eric.
>
> Instead of
> if (data & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> check should be like this:
>
> + if ((ethtool_op_get_flags(netdev) & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO) !=
> + (data & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Will provide patch soon.
Yep, that should fix issue in netxen.
I'm afraid some other drivers can have similar problem after
adding ETH_FLAG_{TX,RX}VLAN. I think we need to distinguish features
that are configurable at runtime from features that are hardcoded.
I'm going to look at that.
Thanks
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-21 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-18 11:12 LRO disable warnings on kernel 2.6.38 Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-03-18 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-18 14:17 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-18 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-18 15:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-18 19:52 ` David Miller
2011-03-18 19:58 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-18 19:59 ` David Miller
2011-03-18 15:40 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-18 16:18 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-03-21 9:21 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-03-21 9:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 9:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 10:04 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-03-21 10:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 10:27 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-03-21 10:00 ` Amit Salecha
2011-03-21 12:34 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-03-21 13:46 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-21 13:52 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-21 15:10 ` [RFC] net: fix ethtool->set_flags not intended -EINVAL return value Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-21 15:15 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-22 2:41 ` Jesse Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110321123406.GA2376@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=amit.salecha@qlogic.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@comx.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).