netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Amit Salecha <amit.salecha@qlogic.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: LRO disable warnings on kernel 2.6.38
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:46:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110321134647.GA3126@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110321123406.GA2376@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:34:06PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:00:31AM -0500, Amit Salecha wrote:
> > > Well, this warning can be ignored since these NIC dont receive packets
> > > to be forwarded in your setup.
> > >
> > > I would say netxen_nic_set_flags() is buggy : It rejects data if other
> > > flag than ETH_FLAG_LRO is set.
> > >
> > > if (data & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO)
> > >       return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > Brought by commit ef2519b1dd39940 (netxen: fail when try to setup
> > > unsupported features) later corrected by commit 97d1935a61b7fe7a65f98f
> > > (Make ethtool_ops::set_flags() return -EINVAL for unsupported flags)
> > >
> > > Since this drivers asserts NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX (mirroring
> > > ETH_FLAG_TXVLAN), ethtool_op_get_flags() can return more than
> > > ETH_FLAG_LRO.
> > >
> > > dev_disable_lro() then calls netxen_nic_set_flags() with
> > > ETH_FLAG_TXVLAN
> > > -> -EINVAL, and ETH_FLAG_LRO stay ORed in dev->features -> WARNING
> > >
> > >
> > Thanks Eric.
> > 
> > Instead of
> >         if (data & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO)
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > check should be like this:
> > 
> > +    if ((ethtool_op_get_flags(netdev) & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO) !=
> > +                                       (data & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO))
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > Will provide patch soon.
> 
> Yep, that should fix issue in netxen.
> 
> I'm afraid some other drivers can have similar problem after
> adding ETH_FLAG_{TX,RX}VLAN. I think we need to distinguish features
> that are configurable at runtime from features that are hardcoded.
> I'm going to look at that.

Other drivers have this bug too. I'm going to prepare patch with similar fix
like Amit proposed, but also for other drivers. Something like below:

diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
index c1a71bb..38fd0cb 100644
--- a/net/core/ethtool.c
+++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
@@ -141,9 +141,17 @@ u32 ethtool_op_get_flags(struct net_device *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ethtool_op_get_flags);
 
+bool ethtool_invalid_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data, u32 supported)
+{
+	if ((dev->features & ~supported) != (data & ~supported))
+		return true;
+	else
+		return false;
+}
+
 int ethtool_op_set_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data, u32 supported)
 {
-	if (data & ~supported)
+	if (ethtool_invalid_flags(dev, data, supported);
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	dev->features = ((dev->features & ~flags_dup_features) |
diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethtool.c
index 81254be..7a662f1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethtool.c
@@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ vmxnet3_set_flags(struct net_device *netdev, u32 data)
 	u8 lro_present = (netdev->features & NETIF_F_LRO) == 0 ? 0 : 1;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (data & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	if (ethtool_invalid_flags(netdev, data, ETH_FLAG_LRO))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (lro_requested ^ lro_present) {
 		/* toggle the LRO feature*/

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-21 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-18 11:12 LRO disable warnings on kernel 2.6.38 Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-03-18 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-18 14:17   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-18 14:33     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-18 15:15       ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-18 19:52         ` David Miller
2011-03-18 19:58           ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-18 19:59             ` David Miller
2011-03-18 15:40 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-18 16:18 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-03-21  9:21   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-03-21  9:45     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21  9:53       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 10:04         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-03-21 10:11           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 10:27             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-03-21 10:00       ` Amit Salecha
2011-03-21 12:34         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-21 13:46           ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-03-21 13:52             ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-21 15:10               ` [RFC] net: fix ethtool->set_flags not intended -EINVAL return value Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-21 15:15                 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-22  2:41                 ` Jesse Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110321134647.GA3126@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=amit.salecha@qlogic.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hawk@comx.dk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).