[PATCH 1/2] solos-pci: Debugging fixes

[PATCH 1/2] solos-pci: Debugging fixes

[Philip Prindeville]

     Use VPI.VCI notation consistently.

Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville<philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
---
  drivers/atm/solos-pci.c |    4 ++--
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/atm/solos-pci.c b/drivers/atm/solos-pci.c
index 25ef1a4..2c4146a 100644
--- a/drivers/atm/solos-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/atm/solos-pci.c
@@ -710,8 +710,8 @@ void solos_bh(unsigned long card_arg)
  					       le16_to_cpu(header->vci));
  				if (!vcc) {
  					if (net_ratelimit())
-						dev_warn(&card->dev->dev, "Received packet for unknown VCI.VPI %d.%d on port %d\n",
-							 le16_to_cpu(header->vci), le16_to_cpu(header->vpi),
+						dev_warn(&card->dev->dev, "Received packet for unknown VPI.VCI %d.%d on port %d\n",
+							 le16_to_cpu(header->vpi), le16_to_cpu(header->vci),
  							 port);
  					continue;
  				}

Re: [PATCH 1/2] solos-pci: Debugging fixes

[David Miller]

From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:02:54 -0700

>     Use VPI.VCI notation consistently.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville<philipp@redfish-solutions.com>

The Subject line is where you describe what the change does.

If you use the same exact subject line in a set of changes,
over and over again, people have no idea what distinguishes
one of the change from the others.

Please fix up your commit messages so that the Subject lines
are more informative.

Thanks.