From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kurt Van Dijck Subject: SAE J1939: update Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:29:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20110329142907.GB335@kurt.e-circ.dyndns.org> References: <20110314132004.GA333@e-circ.dyndns.org> <20110314135917.GF333@e-circ.dyndns.org> <4D8623BE.2080807@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Oliver Hartkopp Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D8623BE.2080807-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Oliver, Some progress: I dropped the state-machine for the address claiming. This makes it less confusing I hope. I dropped SO_J1939_DEST_MASK. This could be done in userspace by accessing a procfs file, or additional rtnetlink ... Lookup up remote ecu's is not strictly necessary in kernel. I have no idea yet how such library would look like. Can userspace tools be attached to the socketCAN subversion can-utils, or would a seperate dir be necessary? I'd say 'suggestions are welcome' but I know you'd suggest to remove address claiming.. Kurt