From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ROSE: prevent heap corruption with bad facilities
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20110401.214148.242136667.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1300603423.1869.18.camel@dan>
	<1300639685.26693.286.camel@localhost>
	<20110331180225.GA6677@midget.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ben@decadent.org.uk, drosenberg@vsecurity.com, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org
To: jbohac@suse.cz
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:53104
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750860Ab1DBEm0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 2 Apr 2011 00:42:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20110331180225.GA6677@midget.suse.cz>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:02:25 +0200

> So, to get the old behaviour back:

Jiri, please do not submit two patches in one email, it's beyond
confusing.

Instead, please submit a proper two-patch series.

Thanks.