From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: drop anti-dependency on X86_VISWS Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110406.144515.235693855.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1301828839.2837.143.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110403.172407.91341067.davem@davemloft.net> <1301910955.23887.75.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, pazke@donpac.ru, linux-visws-devel@lists.sf.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com To: Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:54056 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932143Ab1DFVpw (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:45:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1301910955.23887.75.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ian Campbell Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:55:55 +0100 > You mean the "!X86_VISWS" I presume? It doesn't make sense to me either. No, I think 32-bit x86 allmodconfig elides XEN because of it's X86_TSC dependency. And, well, you could type "make allmodconfig" on your tree and see for yourself instead of asking me :-)