From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 32832] New: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:07:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110406160713.7ff48ef1@nehalam> (raw)
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:42:39 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Bug 32832] New: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32832
Summary: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more
Product: Networking
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.38
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: IPV4
AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
ReportedBy: kees@outflux.net
Regression: Yes
In 2.6.35 and earlier, shutdown(2) will fully remove a socket. This does not
appear to be true any more and is causing software to misbehave.
2.6.35:
$ ./testcase
parent: 5957
before:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
after:
child: 5961
$ ./testcase
parent: 6001
before:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
after:
child: 6002
2.6.38:
$ ./testcase
parent: 1138
before:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
after:
child: 1142
$ ./testcase
bind: Address already in use
The listener doesn't show up in netstat any more, but as long as the child
process is running, the socket is unavailable. It is as if the shutdown(2)
behavior has partially reverted to close(2) behavior (but in the case of using
close(2), the child's socket would remain visible in netstat).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 23:07 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2011-04-06 23:48 ` [Bug 32832] New: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more David Miller
2011-04-08 21:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-08 21:36 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110406160713.7ff48ef1@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).