From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com, fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com
Subject: Re: fedora 14 kernel performance with ip forwarding workload
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:57:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110406195719.GE14697@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110406.121208.189703414.davem@davemloft.net>
Em Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 12:12:08PM -0700, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:51:06 -0700
> > perf showed netfilter being prominent, and removing it gives me much
> > higher throughput. Is there a reason CONFIG_NETFILTER=y ? Isn't it a
> > good thing to be able to disable netfilter if you want to?
>
> CONFIG_NETFILTER=y is the only possible non-disabled setting, as it's
> a boolean.
>
> All that is enabling is the hooks, and it's not possible to provide
> netfilter at all without the hooks being compiled into the kernel
> image.
>
> Fedora by default is also probably installing several defauly
> netfilter rules, make sure to remove them.
Was there ever any attempt to try to have netfilter built-in but not
causing the performance impact?
Something like ftrace code changing when the user inserts the first
rule?
People wanting top performance disable it in the build, but thos wanting
to stick to vendor provided kernels don't have that choice :)
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 18:51 fedora 14 kernel performance with ip forwarding workload Jesse Brandeburg
2011-04-06 19:12 ` David Miller
2011-04-06 19:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2011-04-06 20:02 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20110406.130239.232756965.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-06 20:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-04-06 20:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-06 20:29 ` David Miller
2011-04-06 20:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-06 21:08 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2011-04-06 21:11 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110406195719.GE14697@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).