From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: swmike@swm.pp.se
Cc: iubica2@yahoo.com, ketil@froyn.name, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Should ICMP echo responses be 'bound to the interface' of the incoming ICMP echo request?
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:44:20 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407.194420.193709030.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104080301280.14027@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 03:02:53 +0200 (CEST)
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, andrei radulescu-banu wrote:
>
>> But here's a problem: the kernel supports only up to 256 route
>> domains, and I'd like to be able to use more interfaces than that,
>> physical plus virtual.
>
> Sounds like that 256 limit should be the thing to be looked into then.
That limit was removed ages ago.
I notice that when discussions occur on this list, a lot of misinformation
gets spread around.
The problem is that the actual networking developers don't read this list,
they read netdev@vger.kernel.org instead.
Maybe it's time that we just get rid of linux-net because it's been nothing
but problematic as users search for information on it and very few people
on that list are knowledgable enough to even consider answering.
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-08 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <459953.12714.qm@web56602.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104080301280.14027@uplift.swm.pp.se>
2011-04-08 2:44 ` David Miller [this message]
2011-04-08 3:32 ` Should ICMP echo responses be 'bound to the interface' of the incoming ICMP echo request? andrei radulescu-banu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110407.194420.193709030.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=iubica2@yahoo.com \
--cc=ketil@froyn.name \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).