netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Scot Doyle <lkml@scotdoyle.com>
Cc: Hiroaki SHIMODA <shimoda.hiroaki@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Nickel <Sebastian.Nickel@hetzner.de>,
	Pallai Roland <pallair@magex.hu>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic when using bridge
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:31:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110411183105.46e86684@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA39330.2030102@scotdoyle.com>

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:48:00 -0500
Scot Doyle <lkml@scotdoyle.com> wrote:

> On 04/09/2011 02:19 AM, Hiroaki SHIMODA wrote:
> >
> > It seems that the bug trap is occurred in ip_options_compile() due to
> > rt is NULL.
> >
> > 	8b 96 cc 00 00 00       mov    0xcc(%rsi),%edx
> > rsi is rt, and 0xcc means rt->rt_spec_dst. So I think below code hit
> > the bug trap.
> >
> > 332	if (skb) {
> > 333		memcpy(&optptr[optptr[2]-1],&rt->rt_spec_dst, 4);<- here
> > 334		opt->is_changed = 1;
> > 335	}
> >
> > And call trace seems as follows.
> >    __netif_receive_skb()
> >      ->  br_handle_frame()
> >           ->  NF_HOOK()
> >                ->  br_nf_pre_routing()
> >                     ->  br_parse_ip_options()
> >                          ->  ip_options_compile()
> >
> > br_parse_ip_options() was introduced at 462fb2a (bridge : Sanitize
> > skb before it enters the IP stack) but ip_options_compile() or
> > ip_options_rcv_srr() seems to be called with no rt info.
> 
> Thanks to a tip from Sebastian, I can now reproduce this panic by 
> running "IP Stack Integrity Checker v0.07" from another machine on the 
> same subnet with command "icmpsic -s x.y.z.a -d x.y.z.b" where "x.y.z.a" 
> is IP address of the other machine and "x.y.z.b" is the IP address of 
> the target. When I enable iptables logging on the target machine, no 
> panic occurs. When I disable iptables logging (but otherwise leave the 
> same iptables rules) a panic occurs within a few seconds.
> 
> Thanks Hiroaki for the analysis of the kernel panic output. I've 
> confirmed that you are correct by placing a printk just before those two 
> lines. In every panic, the printk was triggered on line 333 of 
> net/ipv4/ip_options.c
> 
> The kernel panic does not occur after applying the following patch.
> 
> # diff net/ipv4/ip_options.c.original net/ipv4/ip_options.c.fix
> 332c332
> <                 if (skb) {
> ---
>  >                 if (skb && rt) {
> 374c374
> <                     if (skb) {
> ---
>  >                     if (skb && rt) {
> 
> What do you all think? Will it cause other problems?

It would help if you gave a little more context (like diff -up)
next time.

I think the correct fix is for the skb handed to ip_compile_options
to match the layout expected by ip_compile_options.

This patch is compile tested only, please validate.


Subject: [PATCH] bridge: set pseudo-route table before calling ip_comple_options

For some ip options, ip_compile_options assumes it can find the associated
route table. The bridge to iptables code doesn't supply the necessary
reference causing NULL dereference.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>

---
Patch against net-next-2.6, but if validated should go to net-2.6
and stable.

--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c	2011-04-11 18:18:22.534837859 -0700
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c	2011-04-11 18:25:15.427244826 -0700
@@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ static int br_parse_ip_options(struct sk
 	struct ip_options *opt;
 	struct iphdr *iph;
 	struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
+	struct rtable *rt;
 	u32 len;
 
 	iph = ip_hdr(skb);
@@ -255,6 +256,14 @@ static int br_parse_ip_options(struct sk
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	/* Associate bogus bridge route table */
+	rt = bridge_parent_rtable(dev);
+	if (!rt) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
+
 	opt->optlen = iph->ihl*4 - sizeof(struct iphdr);
 	if (ip_options_compile(dev_net(dev), opt, skb))
 		goto inhdr_error;


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-08  1:20 Kernel panic when using bridge Scot Doyle
2011-04-08 13:49 ` Sebastian Nickel
2011-04-08 14:57   ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-08 19:12     ` Pallai Roland
2011-04-08 19:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-09  4:51   ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-09  7:19     ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-11 23:48       ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12  1:31         ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2011-04-12  3:47           ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12  4:09             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12  4:22               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12  5:17                 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12  5:51                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12  7:02                     ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12  7:31                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12  8:39                         ` [PATCH] inetpeer: reduce stack usage Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 14:51                           ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-12 14:55                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 20:58                               ` David Miller
2011-04-12 11:49                       ` Kernel panic when using bridge Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 13:02                         ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 13:15                           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 14:19                             ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 14:49                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 15:13                                 ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 16:14                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 16:20                                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-12 16:35                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 16:45                                         ` Bandan Das
2011-04-12 16:54                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 17:18                                             ` [PATCH] bridge: reset IPCB in br_parse_ip_options Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 20:39                                               ` David Miller
2011-04-12 23:55                                               ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13  4:12                                                 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:10                                                   ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:24                                                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-13 15:54                                                       ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:28                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13 21:48                                                       ` David Miller
2011-04-14  0:03                                                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14  0:05                                                           ` David Miller
2011-04-14  0:08                                                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14  2:31                                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14  2:54                                                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14  3:03                                                             ` [PATCH] ip: ip_options_compile() resilient to NULL skb route Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14  3:30                                                               ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-14  3:37                                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14  4:15                                                                   ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-14 13:34                                                                     ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-14 15:55                                                                 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 22:02                                                                   ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-14 22:04                                                                     ` David Miller
2011-04-14 23:20                                                                   ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-15  6:26                                                                     ` David Miller
2011-04-12 16:32                                     ` Kernel panic when using bridge Bandan Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110411183105.46e86684@nehalam \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=Sebastian.Nickel@hetzner.de \
    --cc=lkml@scotdoyle.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pallair@magex.hu \
    --cc=shimoda.hiroaki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).