From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Scot Doyle <lkml@scotdoyle.com>
Cc: Hiroaki SHIMODA <shimoda.hiroaki@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Nickel <Sebastian.Nickel@hetzner.de>,
Pallai Roland <pallair@magex.hu>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic when using bridge
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:31:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110411183105.46e86684@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA39330.2030102@scotdoyle.com>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:48:00 -0500
Scot Doyle <lkml@scotdoyle.com> wrote:
> On 04/09/2011 02:19 AM, Hiroaki SHIMODA wrote:
> >
> > It seems that the bug trap is occurred in ip_options_compile() due to
> > rt is NULL.
> >
> > 8b 96 cc 00 00 00 mov 0xcc(%rsi),%edx
> > rsi is rt, and 0xcc means rt->rt_spec_dst. So I think below code hit
> > the bug trap.
> >
> > 332 if (skb) {
> > 333 memcpy(&optptr[optptr[2]-1],&rt->rt_spec_dst, 4);<- here
> > 334 opt->is_changed = 1;
> > 335 }
> >
> > And call trace seems as follows.
> > __netif_receive_skb()
> > -> br_handle_frame()
> > -> NF_HOOK()
> > -> br_nf_pre_routing()
> > -> br_parse_ip_options()
> > -> ip_options_compile()
> >
> > br_parse_ip_options() was introduced at 462fb2a (bridge : Sanitize
> > skb before it enters the IP stack) but ip_options_compile() or
> > ip_options_rcv_srr() seems to be called with no rt info.
>
> Thanks to a tip from Sebastian, I can now reproduce this panic by
> running "IP Stack Integrity Checker v0.07" from another machine on the
> same subnet with command "icmpsic -s x.y.z.a -d x.y.z.b" where "x.y.z.a"
> is IP address of the other machine and "x.y.z.b" is the IP address of
> the target. When I enable iptables logging on the target machine, no
> panic occurs. When I disable iptables logging (but otherwise leave the
> same iptables rules) a panic occurs within a few seconds.
>
> Thanks Hiroaki for the analysis of the kernel panic output. I've
> confirmed that you are correct by placing a printk just before those two
> lines. In every panic, the printk was triggered on line 333 of
> net/ipv4/ip_options.c
>
> The kernel panic does not occur after applying the following patch.
>
> # diff net/ipv4/ip_options.c.original net/ipv4/ip_options.c.fix
> 332c332
> < if (skb) {
> ---
> > if (skb && rt) {
> 374c374
> < if (skb) {
> ---
> > if (skb && rt) {
>
> What do you all think? Will it cause other problems?
It would help if you gave a little more context (like diff -up)
next time.
I think the correct fix is for the skb handed to ip_compile_options
to match the layout expected by ip_compile_options.
This patch is compile tested only, please validate.
Subject: [PATCH] bridge: set pseudo-route table before calling ip_comple_options
For some ip options, ip_compile_options assumes it can find the associated
route table. The bridge to iptables code doesn't supply the necessary
reference causing NULL dereference.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
---
Patch against net-next-2.6, but if validated should go to net-2.6
and stable.
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c 2011-04-11 18:18:22.534837859 -0700
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c 2011-04-11 18:25:15.427244826 -0700
@@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ static int br_parse_ip_options(struct sk
struct ip_options *opt;
struct iphdr *iph;
struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
+ struct rtable *rt;
u32 len;
iph = ip_hdr(skb);
@@ -255,6 +256,14 @@ static int br_parse_ip_options(struct sk
return 0;
}
+ /* Associate bogus bridge route table */
+ rt = bridge_parent_rtable(dev);
+ if (!rt) {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
+
opt->optlen = iph->ihl*4 - sizeof(struct iphdr);
if (ip_options_compile(dev_net(dev), opt, skb))
goto inhdr_error;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-08 1:20 Kernel panic when using bridge Scot Doyle
2011-04-08 13:49 ` Sebastian Nickel
2011-04-08 14:57 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-08 19:12 ` Pallai Roland
2011-04-08 19:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-09 4:51 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-09 7:19 ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-11 23:48 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12 1:31 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2011-04-12 3:47 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12 4:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 4:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 5:17 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12 5:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 7:02 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12 7:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 8:39 ` [PATCH] inetpeer: reduce stack usage Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 14:51 ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-12 14:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 20:58 ` David Miller
2011-04-12 11:49 ` Kernel panic when using bridge Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 13:02 ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 13:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 14:19 ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 15:13 ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-12 16:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 16:45 ` Bandan Das
2011-04-12 16:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 17:18 ` [PATCH] bridge: reset IPCB in br_parse_ip_options Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 20:39 ` David Miller
2011-04-12 23:55 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 4:12 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:10 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-13 15:54 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13 21:48 ` David Miller
2011-04-14 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14 0:05 ` David Miller
2011-04-14 0:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14 2:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 2:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14 3:03 ` [PATCH] ip: ip_options_compile() resilient to NULL skb route Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 3:30 ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-14 3:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 4:15 ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-14 13:34 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-14 15:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 22:02 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-14 22:04 ` David Miller
2011-04-14 23:20 ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-15 6:26 ` David Miller
2011-04-12 16:32 ` Kernel panic when using bridge Bandan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110411183105.46e86684@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=Sebastian.Nickel@hetzner.de \
--cc=lkml@scotdoyle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pallair@magex.hu \
--cc=shimoda.hiroaki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).