netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Race condition when creating multiple namespaces?
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:01:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201104112301.46776.hans@schillstrom.com> (raw)

Hello
I'v been strugling with this for some time now

When creating multiple namespaces using lxc-start,  un-initialized network namespace parts will be called by the new process in the namespace.
ex. when using conntrack or ipvsadm to quickly,  (a sleep 2 "solves" the problem).
(From what I can see syscall clone() is used in lx-start  i.e. do_fork will be called later on.)
Actually I was debugging ip_vs when closing multiple ns  when I fell into this one.

I have a loop that create 33 containers whith lxc-start ... -- test.sh
the first thing the new conatiner does in test.sh is
#!/bin/bash
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
nc -l -p1234

This results in NULL ptr in ip_conntrack_net_init(struct *net)

and in anoither test test.sh looks like this
#!/bin/bash
ipvsadm --start-daemon=master --mcast-interface=lo
nc -l -p1234

And this results in an uniitialized spinlock in ip_vs_sync

I put a printk in nsproxy: copy_namespaces() and could see a dozens of them
before anything appears from ipvs or conntrack.

My feeling is that when you start up user processes in a new name space, 
all kernel related init should have been done (you should not need to add a sleep to get it working)

All test  made by using todays net-next-2.6 (2.6.39-rc1)

Note:
That neither conntrack or ip_vs modules where loaded,
if modules where loaded before creating new namespaces it all works...

Finally the question,
Should it really work to load modules within a namespace , 
that is a part of netns ?

-- 
Mvh
Hasse Schillstrom
070-699 7150

             reply	other threads:[~2011-04-11 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-11 21:01 Hans Schillstrom [this message]
2011-04-12  0:27 ` Race condition when creating multiple namespaces? Eric W. Biederman
2011-04-12  4:56   ` Hans Schillstrom
2011-04-14 20:46   ` Hans Schillstrom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201104112301.46776.hans@schillstrom.com \
    --to=hans@schillstrom.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).