From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, kees@outflux.net
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 32832] New: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:15:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110412161556.0641bdae.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-32832-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:42:38 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32832
There is a tescase attached to this bugzilla report.
> Summary: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.38
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV4
> AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
> ReportedBy: kees@outflux.net
> Regression: Yes
>
>
> In 2.6.35 and earlier, shutdown(2) will fully remove a socket. This does not
> appear to be true any more and is causing software to misbehave.
>
> 2.6.35:
> $ ./testcase
> parent: 5957
> before:
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> after:
> child: 5961
> $ ./testcase
> parent: 6001
> before:
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> after:
> child: 6002
>
> 2.6.38:
> $ ./testcase
> parent: 1138
> before:
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> after:
> child: 1142
> $ ./testcase
> bind: Address already in use
>
> The listener doesn't show up in netstat any more, but as long as the child
> process is running, the socket is unavailable. It is as if the shutdown(2)
> behavior has partially reverted to close(2) behavior (but in the case of using
> close(2), the child's socket would remain visible in netstat).
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-32832-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-04-12 23:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-04-12 23:17 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 32832] New: shutdown(2) does not fully shut down socket any more David Miller
2011-04-12 23:41 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 2:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13 3:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13 11:57 ` Daniel Baluta
2011-04-13 17:43 ` David Miller
2011-04-13 18:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-13 19:09 ` David Miller
2011-04-14 2:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13 7:06 ` Cyril Bonté
2011-04-13 8:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 2:34 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110412161556.0641bdae.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=kees@outflux.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).