From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: reset IPCB in br_parse_ip_options Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:24:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20110413082457.52784d6d@nehalam> References: <4DA3F909.5020609@scotdoyle.com> <1302608951.3233.33.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1302613353.30934.22.camel@polaris.local> <1302614145.3233.47.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1302617968.30934.34.camel@polaris.local> <1302619749.3233.56.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1302621233.30934.44.camel@polaris.local> <1302624851.3233.63.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110412092039.69f420f6@nehalam> <1302626152.3233.66.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110412164557.GF2047@stratus.com> <1302627281.3233.70.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1302628720.3233.84.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4DA4E68B.9010401@scotdoyle.com> <4DA522B2.90200@scotdoyle.com> <4DA5BCF7.9020606@scotdoyle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , David Miller , Hiroaki SHIMODA , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Scot Doyle Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:33017 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753247Ab1DMPZA (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:25:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DA5BCF7.9020606@scotdoyle.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > The net effect is that three patches are required to eliminate the panics. > > These two patches have been accepted by David: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/192015 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/192055 > > This patch, incrementally authored by Stephen and Eric and compiled by > me, is also required: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/192007 > > What should happen for this third patch to be included upstream? Although making IP more robust is a good. I still think bridging shouldn't give bad packets to IP.