From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] bonding: notify when bonding device address changes Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:18:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20110416091804.5e6b0b9f@nehalam> References: <20110415184407.550abd88@pomiocik.lan> <4DA89114.9040900@gmail.com> <10227.1302893590@death> <20110415121054.73717900@nehalam> <11728.1302895704@death> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nicolas de =?UTF-8?B?UGVzbG/DvGFu?= , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, roy@marples.name, Andy Gospodarek To: Jay Vosburgh Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:52640 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751877Ab1DPQSG (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:18:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <11728.1302895704@death> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:28:24 -0700 Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > >When a device changes its hardware address, it needs to call the network > >device notifiers to inform protocols. > > > >Compile tested only. I did not audit that all the call sites have the proper locking. When calling notifier, no bridge locks should be held and RTNL mutex should be held.