From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 4/7] sctp: remove useless arguments from get_saddr() call
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:12:27 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110426.001227.112589346.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB6405B.2060200@cn.fujitsu.com>
From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:47:39 +0800
> @@ -392,11 +392,11 @@ static inline int sctp_v6_addr_match_len(union sctp_addr *s1,
> */
> static void sctp_v6_get_saddr(struct sctp_sock *sk,
> struct sctp_transport *t,
> - union sctp_addr *daddr,
> struct flowi *fl)
> {
> struct flowi6 *fl6 = &fl->u.ip6;
> union sctp_addr *saddr = &t->saddr;
> + union sctp_addr *daddr = &t->ipaddr;
>
> SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s: asoc:%p dst:%p daddr:%pI6 ",
> __func__, t->asoc, t->dst, &daddr->v6.sin6_addr);
I really get grumpy when I have to fix up stuff like this:
net/sctp/ipv6.c: In function ‘sctp_v6_get_saddr’:
net/sctp/ipv6.c:382: warning: unused variable ‘daddr’
You guys know I'm going to immediately run make on any patch you send
me and look for new warnings.
Why waste my time and not look for them yourselves before posting the
patch?
This wasn't even one of those cases where the warning goes away at
the end of the patch series, and only exists somewhere in the middle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-26 3:44 [PATCH net-next-2.6 0/7] SCTP updates for net-next-2.6 Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 3:45 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/7] sctp: fix sctp to work with ipv6 source address routing Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 3:46 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/7] sctp: cache the ipv6 source after route lookup Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 3:47 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 3/7] sctp: make sctp over IPv6 work with IPsec Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 3:47 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 4/7] sctp: remove useless arguments from get_saddr() call Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 7:12 ` David Miller [this message]
2011-04-26 7:20 ` David Miller
2011-04-26 8:06 ` Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 3:48 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 5/7] sctp: clean up route lookup calls Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 3:48 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 6/7] sctp: clean up IPv6 route and XFRM lookups Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 7/7] sctp: fix IPv6 source address output routing with IPsec Wei Yongjun
2011-04-26 7:12 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 0/7] SCTP updates for net-next-2.6 David Miller
2011-04-26 21:51 ` David Miller
2011-04-27 0:59 ` Wei Yongjun
2011-04-27 1:47 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110426.001227.112589346.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).