From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC reserves Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:19:33 +1000 Message-ID: <20110428161933.1f1266e6@notabene.brown> References: <1303920491-25302-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1303920491-25302-9-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux-MM , Linux-Netdev , LKML , David Miller , Peter Zijlstra To: Mel Gorman Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1303920491-25302-9-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:08:06 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: > @@ -1578,7 +1589,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(struct net_device *dev, > */ > static inline struct page *__netdev_alloc_page(struct net_device *dev, gfp_t gfp_mask) > { > - return alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask, 0); > + return alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask | __GFP_MEMALLOC, 0); > } > I'm puzzling a bit over this change. __netdev_alloc_page appears to be used to get pages to put in ring buffer for a network card to DMA received packets into. So it is OK to use __GFP_MEMALLOC for these allocations providing we mark the resulting skb as 'pfmemalloc' if a reserved page was used. However I don't see where that marking is done. I think it should be in skb_fill_page_desc, something like: if (page->pfmemalloc) skb->pfmemalloc = true; Is this covered somewhere else that I am missing? Thanks, NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org