* Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
[not found] <20110429131940.4f4c938f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
@ 2011-04-29 16:26 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-04-29 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2011-04-29 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, netdev; +Cc: linux-next, LKML
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:19:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20110428:
when CONFIG_MODULES is not enabled:
bpf_jit_comp.c:(.text+0x43cc2): undefined reference to `module_free'
(.text+0x4521a): undefined reference to `module_alloc'
(.text+0x453af): undefined reference to `module_free'
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
2011-04-29 16:26 ` linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit) Randy Dunlap
@ 2011-04-29 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-29 17:21 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2011-04-29 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap, David Miller; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, netdev, linux-next, LKML
Le vendredi 29 avril 2011 à 09:26 -0700, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:19:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20110428:
>
>
> when CONFIG_MODULES is not enabled:
>
> bpf_jit_comp.c:(.text+0x43cc2): undefined reference to `module_free'
> (.text+0x4521a): undefined reference to `module_alloc'
> (.text+0x453af): undefined reference to `module_free'
>
>
Oh well, I guess we can add one 'depends on MODULES' like we do for
KPROBES (it also uses module_alloc())
Not sure many people build a !CONFIG_MODULES kernel these days...
Thanks Randy !
[PATCH net-next-2.6] bpf: depends on MODULES
module_alloc() and module_free() are available only if CONFIG_MODULES=y
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
net/Kconfig | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig
index 745fb02..878151c 100644
--- a/net/Kconfig
+++ b/net/Kconfig
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ config HAVE_BPF_JIT
config BPF_JIT
bool "enable BPF Just In Time compiler"
depends on HAVE_BPF_JIT
+ depends on MODULES
---help---
Berkeley Packet Filter filtering capabilities are normally handled
by an interpreter. This option allows kernel to generate a native
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
2011-04-29 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2011-04-29 17:21 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-04-29 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eric.dumazet; +Cc: randy.dunlap, sfr, netdev, linux-next, linux-kernel
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:19:18 +0200
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] bpf: depends on MODULES
>
> module_alloc() and module_free() are available only if CONFIG_MODULES=y
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks.
Perhaps we can solve these things by seperating out the dependency,
via "CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOC" and making things like KPROBES and
BPF 'select' it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-29 17:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20110429131940.4f4c938f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2011-04-29 16:26 ` linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit) Randy Dunlap
2011-04-29 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-29 17:21 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).