From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: zhou rui <zhourui.cn@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jon.zhou@jdsu.com
Subject: Re: same application has different performance with kernel 2.6.32/34/36
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:48:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429084848.64a48efa@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinF8Mfs+pqfGV0bLqm_3VyKCMn0LA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:46:04 +0800
zhou rui <zhourui.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi
> my test application add a packet hook via dev_add_pack(&prot_hook);
> then copy the packet to a shared memory between userspace and kernel
>
> tests wereperformed at same machine(DL380 G7, 12cores, intel X520 10G
> nic),same traffic,same nic driver(ixgbe 3.3.9)
>
> kernel 2.6.32.12 (SUSE SLES11,SP1)
> APPlication cpu usage: 5-6%
>
>
> kernel updated to 2.6.34.7
> APPlication cpu usage: 19-25%
>
> kernel 2.6.36.4 (enable/disable RPS)
> APPlication cpu usage 35-40%
>
>
> before I installing profile tool to find the root cause, any idea about it?
> 'top' result is not accurate in older kernel? or any kernel
> module/feature impact this?
The report is appreciated, but since your application is not part of the main
kernel, developers are going to be unable to provide much direct help.
If it is closed source, go away we won't help with closed kernel components.
If it is open source, post a link where people can download it.
This is the kind of problem that requires effort and running multiple
times and using kernel bisection can show which change had the most impact.
It could be driver, scheduling or the change to packet steering.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 14:46 same application has different performance with kernel 2.6.32/34/36 zhou rui
2011-04-29 15:48 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110429084848.64a48efa@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=jon.zhou@jdsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhourui.cn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox