From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 15:53:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110506135345.GA3434@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304688438.29544.16.camel@dan>
Quoting Dan Rosenberg:
| A length of zero (after subtracting two for the type and len fields) for
| the DCCPO_{CHANGE,CONFIRM}_{L,R} options will cause an underflow due to
| the subtraction. The subsequent code may read past the end of the
| options value buffer when parsing. I'm unsure of what the consequences
| of this might be, but it's probably not good.
|
Can you please check again: did you experience this condition, to me it
seems the patch is based on reading this code.
In this case, please consider the condition before the switch statement:
/* Check if this isn't a single byte option */
if (opt > DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED) {
if (opt_ptr == opt_end)
goto out_nonsensical_length;
len = *opt_ptr++;
if (len < 2)
goto out_nonsensical_length;
The described range (DCCPO_CHANGE_L = 32 ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R = 35) is after DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED = 31,
so that the above test applies.
Hence for these option types the len is always at least 1, so that (len - 1) >= 0.
| --- a/net/dccp/options.c
| +++ b/net/dccp/options.c
| @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct dccp_request_sock *dreq,
| case DCCPO_CHANGE_L ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R:
| if (pkt_type == DCCP_PKT_DATA) /* RFC 4340, 6 */
| break;
| + if (len == 0)
| + goto out_invalid_option;
| rc = dccp_feat_parse_options(sk, dreq, mandatory, opt,
| *value, value + 1, len - 1);
| if (rc)
|
|
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-06 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 13:27 [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-06 13:53 ` Gerrit Renker [this message]
2011-05-06 14:43 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-06 19:57 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 20:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110506135345.GA3434@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).