netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scalability of interface creation and deletion
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 07:47:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110508144749.GR2641@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C449131127D58077CB25C9D8@Ximines.local>

On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:27:07PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> Paul,
> 
> >>Yes, really 20-49us and 50-99us, not ms. Raw data attached :-)
> >>
> >>I'm guessing there are circumstances where there is an early exit.
> >
> >Well, if you were onlining and offlining CPUs, then if there was only
> >one CPU online, this could happen.
> 
> No, I wasn't doing that.

OK.

> > And there really is only one CPU
> >online during boot, so if your measurements included early boot time,
> >this could easily explain these very short timings.
> 
> No, I waited a few minutes after boot for the system to stabilize, and
> all CPUs were definitely online.
> 
> The patch to the kernel I am running is below.

OK, interesting...

My guess is that you need to be using ktime_get_ts().  Isn't ktime_get()
subject to various sorts of adjustment?

> >>There is nothing much going on these systems (idle, no other users,
> >>just normal system daemons).
> >
> >And normal system daemons might cause this, right?
> 
> Yes. Everything is normal, except I did
> service udev stop
> unshare -n bash
> which together stop the system running interface scripts when
> interfaces are created (as upstart and upstart-udev-bridge are
> now integrated, you can't kill upstart, so you have to rely on
> unshare -n to stop the events being propagated). That's just
> to avoid measuring the time it takes to execute the scripts.

OK, so you really could be seeing grace periods started by these system
daemons.

							Thanx, Paul

> -- 
> Alex Bligh
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index dd4aea8..e401018 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1518,6 +1518,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_bh);
> void synchronize_sched(void)
> {
>        struct rcu_synchronize rcu;
> +       ktime_t time_start = ktime_get();
> 
>        if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
>                return;
> @@ -1529,6 +1530,7 @@ void synchronize_sched(void)
>        /* Wait for it. */
>        wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
>        destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rcu.head);
> +       pr_err("synchronize_sched() in %lld us\n",
> ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), time_start));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched);
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 856b6ee..013f627 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -5164,7 +5164,9 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(struct
> list_head *head)
>        dev = list_first_entry(head, struct net_device, unreg_list);
>        call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, dev);
> 
> +       pr_err("begin rcu_barrier()\n");
>        rcu_barrier();
> +       pr_err("end rcu_barrier()\n");
> 
>        list_for_each_entry(dev, head, unreg_list)
>                dev_put(dev);
> @@ -5915,8 +5917,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_netdev);
>  */
> void synchronize_net(void)
> {
> +       pr_err("begin synchronize_net()\n");
>        might_sleep();
>        synchronize_rcu();
> +       pr_err("end synchronize_net()\n");
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_net);
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-08 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-07 11:08 Scalability of interface creation and deletion Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 12:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 15:26   ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 15:54     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 16:23       ` Ben Greear
2011-05-07 16:37         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 16:44           ` Ben Greear
2011-05-07 16:51             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08  3:45               ` Ben Greear
2011-05-08  8:08                 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-09 21:46       ` Octavian Purdila
2011-05-07 16:26     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:24       ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:32         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:39           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08 10:09             ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:42           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:50             ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08  7:12             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08  8:06               ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08  9:35               ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:18                 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:50                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 13:13                     ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 13:44                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 14:27                         ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 14:47                           ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-05-08 15:17                             ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 15:48                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 21:00                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  4:44                                   ` [PATCH] veth: use batched device unregister Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  6:56                                     ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-09  8:20                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  9:17                                         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: use batched device unregister in veth and macvlan Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 18:42                                           ` David Miller
2011-05-09 19:05                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 20:17                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10  6:40                                                 ` [PATCH net-2.6] vlan: fix GVRP at dismantle time Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 19:23                                                   ` David Miller
2011-05-09  7:45                                     ` [PATCH v2 net-next-2.6] veth: use batched device unregister Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  9:22                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  5:37                                   ` Scalability of interface creation and deletion Alex Bligh
2011-05-09  6:37                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  7:11                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-09 17:30                                   ` Jesse Gross
2011-05-08 12:44                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 13:06                   ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 13:14                     ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:32               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-07 18:51           ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 19:24             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:38       ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:44         ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110508144749.GR2641@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).