netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH] rtnetlink: Add method to calculate dump info data size
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 20:17:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110509201705.409f6d39@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304995413.3050.19.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Tue, 10 May 2011 04:43:33 +0200
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:

> Le lundi 09 mai 2011 à 15:26 -0700, Greg Rose a écrit :
> > The message size allocated for rtnl info dumps was limited to a single
> > page.  This is not enough for additional interface info available with
> > devices that support SR-IOV.  Calculate the amount of data required so
> > the dump can allocate enough data to satisfy the request.
> > 
> > V2 of this patch adds a new argument to the rtnl_register service that
> > allows for a new method to calculate the amount of data required to
> > complete the info dump request.  So far the method is only implemented
> > for the RTM_GETLINK slot.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@intel.com>
> 
> >  
> > +static u16 rtnl_calcit(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > +	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
> > +	int h;
> > +	int idx = 0, s_idx;
> > +	struct net_device *dev;
> > +	struct hlist_head *head;
> > +	struct hlist_node *node;
> > +	u16 alloc_size = 0;
> > +
> > +	for (h = 0; h < NETDEV_HASHENTRIES; h++, s_idx = 0) {
> > +		idx = 0;
> > +		head = &net->dev_index_head[h];
> > +		hlist_for_each_entry(dev, node, head, index_hlist) {
> > +			if (idx < s_idx) {
> > +				idx++;
> > +				continue;
> > +			}
> > +			alloc_size = (u16)if_nlmsg_size(dev);
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return alloc_size;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> 
> Sorry this wont scale. Some machines have thousand of devices.
> 
> Just make an upper approximation, you dont need an exact one ;)

The route dump does scale, can't you use a similar logic?
The result doesn't come back as one huge allocation.
I regularly test 600K routes on small machines.

-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-10  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-09 22:26 [RFC V2 PATCH] rtnetlink: Add method to calculate dump info data size Greg Rose
2011-05-09 22:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-09 22:49   ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-05-10  2:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10  3:17   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2011-05-10  3:45     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10  3:49       ` David Miller
2011-05-10  4:25         ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-05-10  3:56       ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-10  3:58         ` David Miller
2011-05-10  4:03         ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110509201705.409f6d39@nehalam \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregory.v.rose@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).