From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc6-mmotm0506 - another lockdep splat (networking this
 time)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20110510.145909.193724537.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1304999271.3050.41.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	<20110509.205851.189693332.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1305064116.2437.34.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1305064116.2437.34.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

=46rom: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:48:36 +0200

> Le lundi 09 mai 2011 =E0 20:58 -0700, David Miller a =E9crit :
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 05:47:51 +0200
>>=20
>> > [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: fix two lockdep splats
>> >=20
>> > Commit e67f88dd12f6 (net: dont hold rtnl mutex during netlink dump
>> > callbacks) switched rtnl protection to RCU, but we forgot to adjus=
t two
>> > rcu_dereference() lockdep annotations :
>> >=20
>> > inet_get_link_af_size() or inet_fill_link_af() might be called wit=
h
>> > rcu_read_lock or rtnl held, so use rcu_dereference_rtnl()
>> > instead of rtnl_dereference()
>> >=20
>> > Reported-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
>> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>>=20
>> Applied, thanks everyone.
>=20
> David, I found you applied this patch for net-2.6, but it was
> net-next-2.6 material only ...

Thanks for catching that, I'll fix this.