From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Schillstrom Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] ipvs: Use IP_VS_RT_MODE_* instead of magic constants. Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 07:28:19 +0200 Message-ID: <201105120728.19993.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> References: <20110509.223118.260083861.davem@davemloft.net> <20110510.153051.71135029.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Julian Anastasov Return-path: Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net ([193.180.251.61]:43804 "EHLO mailgw10.se.ericsson.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752806Ab1ELF2Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 01:28:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 12 May 2011 01:32:09 Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, 10 May 2011, David Miller wrote: > > > > Following patch can be used after patch 4, eg. as > > > number 6 because patches 4 and 5 are ok and we are going to replace > > > patches 6 and 7. > > > > Thanks Julian. > > > > What I'm going to do is hold back the IPVS parts of the patches I > > posted last night. In particular, I'll integrate this into the > > original patch #4. > > > > And then we can work through the reimplementation ideas you posted to > > me in private email. > > My simple tests do not show any problems with patches > 4, 5 and the new 6 and 7. I tested TUN mode for rt_src/rt_dst > and DR/NAT for rt_dst replacement, related ICMP is relayed properly. > So, we should be ok but I'll do more tests in the following > days because the list with possible combinations for testing > is too long: different forwarding mode (DR/TUN/NAT), > local or remote real server, local or remote client, > In or Out related ICMP, Passive or Active FTP... > I will try to test the Backup/Failover aspects of above -- Regards Hans Schillstrom