From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: new ethtool stat "tx_timeout" to account
 for tx_timeouts
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:26:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20110518.172634.2102201592173243863.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1305752945-14843-2-git-send-email-decot@google.com>
	<20110518.171416.1780927258138770742.davem@davemloft.net>
	<BANLkTimNvuB5HtOKfAc7rf5wF2QeC3xdXw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: joe@perches.com, szymon@janc.net.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-net-upstream@google.com,
	snanda@google.com
To: decot@google.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimNvuB5HtOKfAc7rf5wF2QeC3xdXw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: David Decotigny <decot@google.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:20:21 -0700

> Hi David,
> 
> They should be independent and applicable in any order, except for the
> two 'PATCH x/2' which have to go together.

That doesn't matter.

When you are sending a set of patches, always number them.

Please resubmit your changes with my feedback incorporated, I'm
not applying what you sent until everything is fixed up.

Thanks.