From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [Bridge] [Patch] bridge: call NETDEV_ENSLAVE notifiers when adding a slave Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:04:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20110519090411.1f039a88@nehalam> References: <1305794393-20775-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1305800661-4081-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20110519081213.15c05da2@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Amerigo Wang , Neil Horman , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110519081213.15c05da2@nehalam> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 May 2011 08:12:13 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2011 18:24:17 +0800 > Amerigo Wang wrote: > > > In the previous patch I added NETDEV_ENSLAVE, now > > we can notify netconsole when adding a device to a bridge too. > > > > By the way, s/netdev_bonding_change/call_netdevice_notifiers/ in > > bond_main.c, since this is not bonding specific. > > > > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong > > Cc: Neil Horman > > > > Is there a usage for this? What listens for this notification? Never mind it was in the first patch which you did not send. You should always put a number on group of patches and send to all parties. Also, sending networking patches to LKML is a waste of bandwidth please don't bother.