From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jmorris@namei.org, kaber@trash.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mmarek@suse.cz,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, pekkas@netcore.fi,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] igmp: call ip_mc_clear_src() only when we have no users of ip_mc_list
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 18:27:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110520162709.GA3497@darkmag.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF11F57B2A.6B43B7E6-ON88257893.005490B0-88257893.00615176@us.ibm.com>
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:42:59AM -0700, David Stevens wrote:
> Veaceslav,
> It looks to me like this will leak the source filters if we are
> called from ip_mc_destroy_dev(),
> Even with your previous patch, you're assuming that we don't free the
> ip_mc_list and so we have the
> same one when we up the device, but if there are no timers running, it
> looks like refcnt canl go to 0 and free
> it. If we can ever free the ip_mc_list when users != 0 (or going to 0
> immediately after the drop), we
> have to do the ip_mc_clear_src() or leak the list. I haven't looked at
> this code in years, so I'll need
> to refresh my memory.
> So, I'll look at that a bit more; at a minimum, I think you need
> to do the clear_src
> also in the destroy case. We could lose the filters and set the exclude
> count to users, instead
> of 1; but I like the idea of keeping the source filters across a down/up,
> if we can be sure there
> are no cases where we free the ip_mc_list without first freeing all the
> filters.
>
> +-DLS
Yes, you are completely right, we can leak the sources on
ip_mc_destroy_dev() when we've ip_ma_put() it inside all the timers. Also,
I've seen that we called igmp_group_dropped() for every mc in dev->mc_list,
however we've done it already in ip_mc_down() before, which wouldn't lead
to anything (cause the device is already ->dead, and all timers are
stopped), but just would be a waste of time.
So, does this patch seem ok? If yes, I'll send it with the changelog.
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
index 1fd3d9c..57ca93a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -1169,20 +1169,18 @@ static void igmp_group_dropped(struct ip_mc_list *im)
if (!in_dev->dead) {
if (IGMP_V1_SEEN(in_dev))
- goto done;
+ return;
if (IGMP_V2_SEEN(in_dev)) {
if (reporter)
igmp_send_report(in_dev, im, IGMP_HOST_LEAVE_MESSAGE);
- goto done;
+ return;
}
/* IGMPv3 */
igmpv3_add_delrec(in_dev, im);
igmp_ifc_event(in_dev);
}
-done:
#endif
- ip_mc_clear_src(im);
}
static void igmp_group_added(struct ip_mc_list *im)
@@ -1319,6 +1317,7 @@ void ip_mc_dec_group(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 addr)
*ip = i->next_rcu;
in_dev->mc_count--;
igmp_group_dropped(i);
+ ip_mc_clear_src(i);
if (!in_dev->dead)
ip_rt_multicast_event(in_dev);
@@ -1428,7 +1427,8 @@ void ip_mc_destroy_dev(struct in_device *in_dev)
in_dev->mc_list = i->next_rcu;
in_dev->mc_count--;
- igmp_group_dropped(i);
+ /* We've dropped the groups in ip_mc_down already */
+ ip_mc_clear_src(i);
ip_ma_put(i);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-20 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-15 16:59 [PATCH 1/1] igmp: fix ip_mc_clear_src to not reset ip_mc_list->sf{mode,count} Veaceslav Falico
2011-05-16 18:03 ` David Miller
2011-05-16 20:42 ` David Stevens
2011-05-17 13:30 ` Veaceslav Falico
2011-05-17 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] igmp: call ip_mc_clear_src() only when we have no users of ip_mc_list Veaceslav Falico
2011-05-17 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 " Veaceslav Falico
2011-05-17 17:42 ` David Stevens
2011-05-20 16:27 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2011-05-23 17:41 ` David Stevens
2011-05-24 9:15 ` [PATCH v4 " Veaceslav Falico
2011-05-24 17:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110520162709.GA3497@darkmag.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).