From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 24 (ratelimits, CONFIG_PRINTK not enabled) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:14:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20110524.161452.895009516730675746.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1306266580.2298.55.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20110524.155337.1293466135362760665.davem@davemloft.net> <4DDC1107.4050004@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: joe@perches.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: randy.dunlap@oracle.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DDC1107.4050004@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Randy Dunlap Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:11:51 -0700 > On 05/24/11 12:53, David Miller wrote: >> From: Joe Perches >> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:49:40 -0700 >> >>> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 15:32 -0400, David Miller wrote: >>>> From: Joe Perches >>>> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:49:48 -0700 >>>>> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:33 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>>>> Adding to causes other problems: >>>>> Yup, that's not a good solution. >>>> Please come up with a fix or I'll have to revert, thanks Joe. >>> >>> I have some errands to run for awhile. >>> >>> Probably a revert today and another patch set tomorrow >>> might be best. >>> >>> This seems to work and doesn't cause any extra state to be >>> instantiated when !CONFIG_PRINTK. What do you think? >> >> Seems fine, here it is as a patch. >> >> Randy please test this, thanks: > > Works here. > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap Thanks Randy, once my allmodconfig+!CONFIG_PRINTK build finishes I'll push this out.