From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: use synchronize_rcu_expedited()
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:44:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110524154445.GC2266@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306228052.3026.16.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:07:32AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> synchronize_rcu() is very slow in various situations (HZ=100,
> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y, CONFIG_PREEMPT=n)
>
> Extract from my (mostly idle) 8 core machine :
>
> synchronize_rcu() in 99985 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 79982 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 87612 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 79827 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 109860 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 98039 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 89841 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 79842 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 80151 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 119833 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 99858 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 73999 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 79855 us
> synchronize_rcu() in 79853 us
>
>
> When we hold RTNL mutex, we would like to spend some cpu cycles but not
> block too long other processes waiting for this mutex.
>
> We also want to setup/dismantle network features as fast as possible at
> boot/shutdown time.
>
> This patch makes synchronize_net() call the expedited version if RTNL is
> locked.
>
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() typical delay is about 20 us on my machine.
>
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 18 us
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 18 us
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 18 us
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 18 us
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 20 us
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 16 us
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 20 us
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 18 us
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() in 18 us
Cool!!!
Just out of curiosity, how many CPUs does your system have?
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index bcb05cb..ec11d75 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -5954,7 +5954,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_netdev);
> void synchronize_net(void)
> {
> might_sleep();
> - synchronize_rcu();
> + if (rtnl_is_locked())
> + synchronize_rcu_expedited();
> + else
> + synchronize_rcu();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_net);
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 9:07 [PATCH] net: use synchronize_rcu_expedited() Eric Dumazet
2011-05-24 15:44 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-05-24 15:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-24 19:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-24 19:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 17:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110524154445.GC2266@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).