From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hsweeten@visionengravers.com,
ryan@bluewatersys.com, kernel@wantstofly.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ep93xx_eth: drop GFP_DMA from memory allocations
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 12:27:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110529112742.GA24876@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110529105946.GA2655@acer>
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:59:46PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> FYI, I just enabled DMA debugging and I've got:
>
> [ 1.980000] WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:911 check_sync+0x460/0x510()
> [ 1.980000] NULL NULL: DMA-API: device driver tries to sync DMA memory it has not allocated [device address=0x00000000c5a11800] [size=78 bytes]
That's because of the 'allocate one buffer, map it once, then treat it
as two buffers' thing. DMA API debugging requires that the struct
device, and device address match:
static struct dma_debug_entry *hash_bucket_find(struct hash_bucket *bucket,
struct dma_debug_entry *ref)
{
struct dma_debug_entry *entry, *ret = NULL;
int matches = 0, match_lvl, last_lvl = 0;
list_for_each_entry(entry, &bucket->list, list) {
if ((entry->dev_addr != ref->dev_addr) ||
(entry->dev != ref->dev))
continue;
so the practice of using dma_sync_single_for_xxx() with partial buffers
is prohibited by this code (which I've always believed to be the right
answer.) I've always believed that dma_sync_single_range_for_xxx() is
the correct interface for doing this kind of thing.
Others may have a different view, in which case _something_ needs to get
fixed because their view is inconsistent with the debugging code!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-29 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-29 9:03 [PATCH] net: ep93xx_eth: drop GFP_DMA from memory allocations Mika Westerberg
2011-05-29 10:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-29 10:59 ` Mika Westerberg
2011-05-29 11:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110529112742.GA24876@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@iki.fi \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryan@bluewatersys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).