netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Dmitry.Izbitsky@oktetlabs.ru
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 33902] New: tcpi_state field in tcp_info structure reports TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT state
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:05:24 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110606.170524.310088006.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110425143421.3267fcc1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:34:21 -0700

> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:08:36 GMT
> bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> 
>> Setup - TCP connection in ESTABLISHED state. Local socket calls
>> shutdown(SHUT_RDWR). After that peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RDWR).
>> 
>> Local socket should now be in TIME_WAIT state (from specification point 
>> of view). And it's indeed in TIME_WAIT (TCP_TIME_WAIT) state if we look at 
>> /proc/net/tcp (or netstat -t). However, if one tries to get connection state
>> via tcp_info (getsockopt(TCP_INFO)) the reported state is CLOSED (TCP_CLOSE).
>> 
>> Looks like the problem is in tcp_time_wait() function
>> (net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c).
>> It's called with state=TCP_TIME_WAIT, and sets inet_timewaitk_sock
>> *tw->tw_state field to TCP_TIME_WAIT. That's why the state is reported
>> correctly when looking into /proc. However, at the end it calls tcp_done(sk),
>> which itself calls tcp_set_state(TCP_CLOSE), so sk->sk_state is set to
>> TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT. And it's reported this way via TCP_INFO
>> socket option.
>> 
>> Problem is reproduced on 2.6.26, 2.6.38 and is probably observed on earlier
>> kernels.

As far as the user side of the socket is concerned, it is TCP_CLOSE.

For timewait connections we create a completely seperate light-weight object
to manage the network side visible state of the TCP flow.  This is not
accessible from, and is entirely differently from, the heavy-weight full
socket we keep around until the user gives up his final reference.

So I do not see this behavior changing, it would be quite invasive and
expensive to make this work as you expect, and only for marginal gain.

      reply	other threads:[~2011-06-07  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-33902-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-04-25 21:34 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 33902] New: tcpi_state field in tcp_info structure reports TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT state Andrew Morton
2011-06-07  0:05   ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110606.170524.310088006.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=Dmitry.Izbitsky@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).