* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 33902] New: tcpi_state field in tcp_info structure reports TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT state
[not found] <bug-33902-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2011-04-25 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-07 0:05 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2011-04-25 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, Dmitry.Izbitsky
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:08:36 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33902
>
> Summary: tcpi_state field in tcp_info structure reports
> TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT state
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.38
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV4
> AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
> ReportedBy: Dmitry.Izbitsky@oktetlabs.ru
> Regression: No
>
>
> Setup - TCP connection in ESTABLISHED state. Local socket calls
> shutdown(SHUT_RDWR). After that peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RDWR).
>
> Local socket should now be in TIME_WAIT state (from specification point
> of view). And it's indeed in TIME_WAIT (TCP_TIME_WAIT) state if we look at
> /proc/net/tcp (or netstat -t). However, if one tries to get connection state
> via tcp_info (getsockopt(TCP_INFO)) the reported state is CLOSED (TCP_CLOSE).
>
> Looks like the problem is in tcp_time_wait() function
> (net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c).
> It's called with state=TCP_TIME_WAIT, and sets inet_timewaitk_sock
> *tw->tw_state field to TCP_TIME_WAIT. That's why the state is reported
> correctly when looking into /proc. However, at the end it calls tcp_done(sk),
> which itself calls tcp_set_state(TCP_CLOSE), so sk->sk_state is set to
> TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT. And it's reported this way via TCP_INFO
> socket option.
>
> Problem is reproduced on 2.6.26, 2.6.38 and is probably observed on earlier
> kernels.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 33902] New: tcpi_state field in tcp_info structure reports TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT state
2011-04-25 21:34 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 33902] New: tcpi_state field in tcp_info structure reports TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT state Andrew Morton
@ 2011-06-07 0:05 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-06-07 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: netdev, bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, Dmitry.Izbitsky
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:34:21 -0700
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:08:36 GMT
> bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
>> Setup - TCP connection in ESTABLISHED state. Local socket calls
>> shutdown(SHUT_RDWR). After that peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RDWR).
>>
>> Local socket should now be in TIME_WAIT state (from specification point
>> of view). And it's indeed in TIME_WAIT (TCP_TIME_WAIT) state if we look at
>> /proc/net/tcp (or netstat -t). However, if one tries to get connection state
>> via tcp_info (getsockopt(TCP_INFO)) the reported state is CLOSED (TCP_CLOSE).
>>
>> Looks like the problem is in tcp_time_wait() function
>> (net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c).
>> It's called with state=TCP_TIME_WAIT, and sets inet_timewaitk_sock
>> *tw->tw_state field to TCP_TIME_WAIT. That's why the state is reported
>> correctly when looking into /proc. However, at the end it calls tcp_done(sk),
>> which itself calls tcp_set_state(TCP_CLOSE), so sk->sk_state is set to
>> TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT. And it's reported this way via TCP_INFO
>> socket option.
>>
>> Problem is reproduced on 2.6.26, 2.6.38 and is probably observed on earlier
>> kernels.
As far as the user side of the socket is concerned, it is TCP_CLOSE.
For timewait connections we create a completely seperate light-weight object
to manage the network side visible state of the TCP flow. This is not
accessible from, and is entirely differently from, the heavy-weight full
socket we keep around until the user gives up his final reference.
So I do not see this behavior changing, it would be quite invasive and
expensive to make this work as you expect, and only for marginal gain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-07 0:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-33902-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-04-25 21:34 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 33902] New: tcpi_state field in tcp_info structure reports TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_TIME_WAIT state Andrew Morton
2011-06-07 0:05 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).