From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC] should we care of COMPAT mode in bridge ? Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:54:21 -0700 Message-ID: <20110607165421.68760205@s6510.ftrdhcpuser.net> References: <201106062206.29134.arnd@arndb.de> <20110606.130958.1488166895702555231.davem@davemloft.net> <201106062219.33432.arnd@arndb.de> <20110606.132315.1222364671200899036.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arnd@arndb.de, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:46746 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753498Ab1FGXyd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:54:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110606.132315.1222364671200899036.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:23:15 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:19:33 +0200 > > > I think it would be good to first understand why it doesn't work with the > > new style ioctls that are in the kernel. The source code of brctl that > > I'm looking at here contains: > > Eric's 32-bit binary was built against older headers that didn't > define the new ioctls. > > That makes it pretty clear to me that we have to support those > older ioctls in compat mode even after all these years. That is really old, even Debian Lenny isn't that out of date.