From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipv4: Fix packet size calculation for IPsec packets in __ip_append_data Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:30:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20110608053020.GA6489@secunet.com> References: <20110606064603.GB31505@secunet.com> <20110606064802.GC31505@secunet.com> <1307345899.3098.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110606085247.GE31505@secunet.com> <1307423217.2642.59.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , Herbert Xu , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:48335 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752143Ab1FHF0x (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:26:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1307423217.2642.59.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:06:57AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Nick mail was : > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg141308.html > Thanks for providing these informations. > Unfortunatly I could not find on my machines where I put my own > scripts... > > Not a big deal, I suspect we can revert my commit if you say it added a > regression :) > In between I can confirm that we get the slowpath problem back with my patch, so we still have a bug somewhere. Reverting your commit would be just a band aid. I think it is better to find the bug and do a real fix instead. Unfortunatly I fear I'm not able to track it down before my vacation that starts tomorrow. I'll continue to work at it once I'm back...