From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack.
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20110619.165456.1382315060825422595.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <4DFBC00F.4000500@candelatech.com>
	<20110619.162141.790923043226083093.davem@davemloft.net>
	<4DFE8B83.3040501@candelatech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, mirqus@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: greearb@candelatech.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:44721 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754841Ab1FSXy7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:54:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4DFE8B83.3040501@candelatech.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:51:31 -0700

> The last email in the features thread that I saw was a question to
> you.

I'm frustrated with the author because he keeps submitting what
amounts to schemes that have the same problem or are incredibly ugly,
and it's becomming a waste of my time to continue discussing the
matter.

> Is the original author's work worth trying to salvage, or should
> the next person to attempt this ignore all that and start fresh?

The above should make that obvious.