From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: advertise incomplete dumps Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110620.135929.942453687487758741.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1308570046.4322.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, samuel@sortiz.org, aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, tgraf@suug.ch To: johannes@sipsolutions.net Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:33090 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752344Ab1FTVCv (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:02:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1308570046.4322.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Johannes Berg Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:40:46 +0200 > Should we merge this through wireless? From wireless-next it'll go into > net-next quickly, but the converse isn't true, so using it in wireless > would be harder if it was merged through net-next I think? Or John can > cherry-pick into wireless-testing? I'm fine with this going in via the wireless tree, that way we'll see a real user when it merged into net-next-2.6 Acked-by: David S. Miller