From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: unintended ipv4 broadcast policy change Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:27:24 +0800 Message-ID: <20110625002724.GA12880@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20110623170137.69054c83@s6510.ftrdhcpuser.net> <20110623.140821.674961342350404546.davem@davemloft.net> <20110624100121.63bbc93a@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net> <20110624.125406.600608999605842473.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from helcar.apana.org.au ([209.40.204.226]:39238 "EHLO fornost.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752066Ab1FYA1b (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:27:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110624.125406.600608999605842473.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:54:06PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > They must be because this is capturing ETH_P_ALL with type SOCK_PACKET > which means receive all packets unconditionally. sock_queue_rcv_skb calls sk_filter, strange but true :) -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt