From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: what's causing "ip_rt_bug"? Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110628.014117.92807428115239742.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20110627.205544.111681152997205782.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mangoo@wpkg.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bazsi@balabit.hu, hidden@balabit.hu To: ja@ssi.bg Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:34153 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755226Ab1F1Il1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 04:41:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Julian Anastasov Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:13:25 +0300 (EEST) > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, David Miller wrote: > >> TPROXY has special code to make sure that time-wait sockets >> are not assigned to skb->sk, as explained in commit >> d503b30bd648b3cb4e5f50b65d27e389960cc6d9, that would cause >> all kinds of crashes in nfnetlink_log etc. >> >> Therefore we would see skb->sk==NULL at ip_route_me_harder() >> in that case. > > Aha, after this clarification other changes should not > be needed. By this do you mean that you think your patch in this thread is completely sufficient?