netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: possible bridge regression in "bridge: implement [add/del]_slave ops"?
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 08:46:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107040846.45016.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110630100819.0e4b536f@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net>

On Thursday 30 June 2011 19:08:19 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:33:23 +0200
> 
> Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> wrote:
> > * echo $(pgrep rstpd) > /var/run/rstpd.pid
> > * brctl addbr br1
> > * echo 1 > /sys/class/net/br1/bridge/stp_state
> 
> This bogus. You are running both kernel and spanning
> tree daemon at the same time!
> 
> Doing the echo of 1 to stp_state forces kernel spanning
> tree. You want 2 which is what is supposed to be use for user
> mode spanning tree.

Well, at first sight you're right. But looking at the code at 
br_stp_set_enabled() in br_stp_if.c it doesn't matter which value you echo 
into stp_state, it just have to be non-zero
The detection of usermode oder kernelmode STP is done using the usermode 
helper (see br_stp_start). I tried echoing 1, 2 or even 5 into stp_state, with 
a working /sbin/bridge-stp I get 2 from stp_state each time.

Maybe it is valuable to change this odd behavior.

Regards,
Alexander

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-04  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30  8:33 possible bridge regression in "bridge: implement [add/del]_slave ops"? Alexander Stein
2011-06-30 13:27 ` Alexander Stein
2011-06-30 17:03   ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-06-30 17:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-07-01 10:08   ` David Lamparter
2011-07-04  6:46   ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2011-07-05 21:28 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201107040846.45016.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
    --to=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).