From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] e1000e: use GFP_KERNEL allocations at init time Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110711.194556.1386145743297508794.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20110711.193359.1440272794251078589.davem@davemloft.net> <1310438432.2438.26.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, greearb@candelatech.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:51225 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753988Ab1GLCqB (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:46:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1310438432.2438.26.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:40:31 -0700 > On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 19:33 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> You can't until I put patch #1 into my tree, which adds the >> new interfaces used by this patch. > > I applied patch #1 to my queue as well (for testing purposes) since I > saw that patch #2 was dependent. If it passes testing, I (or Bruce) > will just ACK patch #2, that way you can apply both patches at the same > time. Ok.