From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/2] e100: Support RXFCS feature flag. Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:00:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20110712090000.29c17c20@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net> References: <1308942371-12748-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <1308942371-12748-3-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <4E0B3510.2080202@candelatech.com> <4E0B383E.8020807@candelatech.com> <4E0B42CE.30400@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Ben Greear , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIE1pcm9zs2F3?= Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:53167 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753262Ab1GLQAA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:00:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:49:49 +0200 Micha=B3 Miros=B3aw wrote: > wanted_features only reflects what is requested by user, this > combination might be invalid. When conditions change this value > combined with other bits in features are passed through > ndo_fix_features callback and netdev_fix_features() to bring it to > valid state, and then (if resulting set is different than current > features) ndo_set_features() is called to reconfigure device for that > new state change to it. Since this semantic is more complicated than most other parts of network device interface API; could you please put a detailed documentation into Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt The whole netdevices.txt document could use some extending and rewriting as well.