netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
To: mst@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix panic in virtnet_remove
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:27:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110718035730.16001.77240.sendpatchset@krkumar2.in.ibm.com> (raw)

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote on 07/17/2011 03:42:15 PM:

> > modprobe -r virtio_net panics in free_netdev() as the
> > dev is already freed in the newly introduced virtnet_free
> > (commit 3fa2a1df9094).
> 
> Good catch, thanks!
> 
> > Since virtnet_remove doesn't require
> > dev after unregister,
> 
> I'm not sure that true: vi used just above the line you remove
> is I think the struct virtnet_info that is allocated
> as part of that structure.

You are right, the dev cannot be freed in the destructor.

> > I am removing the free_netdev call
> > in virtnet_remove instead of in virtnet_free (which seems
> > to be the right place to free the dev). Confirmed that
> > the panic is fixed with this patch.
> 
> This might be just because the memory isn't reused.
> Try enabling slab poisoning, I think you'll observe some problems.
> 
> Do we absolutely have to have a destructor?
> Can't we move the per cpu counter free from
> virtnet_free to virtnet_remove, and get rid of
> virtnet_free completely?

I see some other drivers doing that, e.g. xennet_remove:
	...
	free_percpu(info->stats);
	free_netdev(info->netdev);
	...

How about this patch (compile tested only)?

Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c |   10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff -ruNp org/drivers/net/virtio_net.c new/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
--- org/drivers/net/virtio_net.c	2011-07-18 09:14:02.000000000 +0530
+++ new/drivers/net/virtio_net.c	2011-07-18 09:16:35.000000000 +0530
@@ -705,14 +705,6 @@ static void virtnet_netpoll(struct net_d
 }
 #endif
 
-static void virtnet_free(struct net_device *dev)
-{
-	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
-
-	free_percpu(vi->stats);
-	free_netdev(dev);
-}
-
 static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
@@ -959,7 +951,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_d
 	/* Set up network device as normal. */
 	dev->netdev_ops = &virtnet_netdev;
 	dev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
-	dev->destructor = virtnet_free;
 
 	SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(dev, &virtnet_ethtool_ops);
 	SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &vdev->dev);
@@ -1122,6 +1113,7 @@ static void __devexit virtnet_remove(str
 	while (vi->pages)
 		__free_pages(get_a_page(vi, GFP_KERNEL), 0);
 
+	free_percpu(vi->stats);
 	free_netdev(vi->dev);
 }
 

             reply	other threads:[~2011-07-18  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-18  3:57 Krishna Kumar [this message]
2011-07-18 13:03 ` [PATCH] Fix panic in virtnet_remove Michael S. Tsirkin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-20  7:43 Krishna Kumar
2011-07-20 15:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-07-15  9:16 Krishna Kumar
2011-07-15 15:19 ` David Miller
2011-07-16  5:32   ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-07-17 10:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110718035730.16001.77240.sendpatchset@krkumar2.in.ibm.com \
    --to=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).