From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Linux 3.0 release Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 04:30:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20110723023023.GC21089@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <4E29CB5B.4040408@unsolicited.net> <4E29D326.7070403@candelatech.com> <20110722133220.0baf2199@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net> <20110723022715.GB21089@mtj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Ben Greear , David , Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52]:45635 "EHLO mail-fx0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750970Ab1GWCa2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:30:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110723022715.GB21089@mtj.dyndns.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 04:27:15AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > While on the topic, we do have some workqueue API problems. The > delayed ones are a bit screwy. e.g. requeueing an already pending > delayed work item should probably update the timer but it doesn't andp > we have a bunch of users doing cancel/requeue or using separate timers > for that. (after reading the other branch of the thread) Ooh, bingo, this actually was the issue which triggered the problem reported here. :) -- tejun