From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: IPv6: autoconfiguration and suspend/resume or link down/up Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:37:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20110723093743.7c90b78f@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net> References: <20110719180222.GA7509@midget.suse.cz> <20110722.010628.1678943945721626312.davem@davemloft.net> <20110722092159.GA20722@gondor.apana.org.au> <4E2ADB39.9070409@gmail.com> <20110723152724.GA11028@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Nicolas de =?ISO-8859-1?B?UGVzbG/8YW4=?= , David Miller , jbohac@suse.cz, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:35977 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753046Ab1GWQhh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:37:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110723152724.GA11028@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 23:27:24 +0800 Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 04:31:21PM +0200, Nicolas de Peslo=FCan wrote= : > > > > That being said, the time to renegotiate a network setup sounds ver= y=20 > > short, compared to the time for a full suspend-migrate-resume cycle= =2E I'm=20 > > not sure VM migration would really suffer from such renegotiation. >=20 > Live migration certainly would suffer from multiple RTTs that > result from renegotiation. >=20 > Cheers, Would it be possible to do live migration without dropping carrier or setting interface down?