netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v3] bonding: fix string comparison errors
@ 2011-07-26 21:12 Andy Gospodarek
  2011-07-28  5:41 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Gospodarek @ 2011-07-26 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Vitalii Demianets, Jay Vosburgh, Takuma Umeya

When a bond contains a device where one name is the subset of another
(eth1 and eth10, for example), one cannot properly set the primary
device or the currently active device.

This was reported and based on work by Takuma Umeya.  I also verified
the problem and tested that this fix resolves it.

V2: A few did not like the the current code or my changes, so I
refactored bonding_store_primary and bonding_store_active_slave to be a
bit cleaner, dropped the use of strnicmp since we did not really need
the comparison to be case insensitive, and formatted the input string
from sysfs so a comparison to IFNAMSIZ could be used.

I also discovered an error in bonding_store_active_slave that would
modify bond->primary_slave rather than bond->curr_active_slave before
forcing the bonding driver to choose a new active slave.

V3: Actually sending the proper patch....

Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Reported-by: Takuma Umeya <tumeya@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c |  133 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
index b60835f..2dfb4bf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
@@ -1025,6 +1025,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_primary(struct device *d,
 	int i;
 	struct slave *slave;
 	struct bonding *bond = to_bond(d);
+	char ifname[IFNAMSIZ];
 
 	if (!rtnl_trylock())
 		return restart_syscall();
@@ -1035,32 +1036,33 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_primary(struct device *d,
 	if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
 		pr_info("%s: Unable to set primary slave; %s is in mode %d\n",
 			bond->dev->name, bond->dev->name, bond->params.mode);
-	} else {
-		bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
-			if (strnicmp
-			    (slave->dev->name, buf,
-			     strlen(slave->dev->name)) == 0) {
-				pr_info("%s: Setting %s as primary slave.\n",
-					bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name);
-				bond->primary_slave = slave;
-				strcpy(bond->params.primary, slave->dev->name);
-				bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-				goto out;
-			}
-		}
+		goto out;
+	}
 
-		/* if we got here, then we didn't match the name of any slave */
+	sscanf(buf, "%16s", ifname); /* IFNAMSIZ */
 
-		if (strlen(buf) == 0 || buf[0] == '\n') {
-			pr_info("%s: Setting primary slave to None.\n",
-				bond->dev->name);
-			bond->primary_slave = NULL;
-				bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-		} else {
-			pr_info("%s: Unable to set %.*s as primary slave as it is not a slave.\n",
-				bond->dev->name, (int)strlen(buf) - 1, buf);
+	/* check to see if we are clearing primary */
+	if (!strlen(ifname) || buf[0] == '\n') {
+		pr_info("%s: Setting primary slave to None.\n",
+			bond->dev->name);
+		bond->primary_slave = NULL;
+		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
+		if (strncmp(slave->dev->name, ifname, IFNAMSIZ) == 0) {
+			pr_info("%s: Setting %s as primary slave.\n",
+				bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name);
+			bond->primary_slave = slave;
+			strcpy(bond->params.primary, slave->dev->name);
+			bond_select_active_slave(bond);
+			goto out;
 		}
 	}
+
+	pr_info("%s: Unable to set %.*s as primary slave.\n",
+		bond->dev->name, (int)strlen(buf) - 1, buf);
 out:
 	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 	read_unlock(&bond->lock);
@@ -1195,6 +1197,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_active_slave(struct device *d,
 	struct slave *old_active = NULL;
 	struct slave *new_active = NULL;
 	struct bonding *bond = to_bond(d);
+	char ifname[IFNAMSIZ];
 
 	if (!rtnl_trylock())
 		return restart_syscall();
@@ -1203,56 +1206,62 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_active_slave(struct device *d,
 	read_lock(&bond->lock);
 	write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 
-	if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode))
+	if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
 		pr_info("%s: Unable to change active slave; %s is in mode %d\n",
 			bond->dev->name, bond->dev->name, bond->params.mode);
-	else {
-		bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
-			if (strnicmp
-			    (slave->dev->name, buf,
-			     strlen(slave->dev->name)) == 0) {
-        			old_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
-        			new_active = slave;
-        			if (new_active == old_active) {
-					/* do nothing */
-					pr_info("%s: %s is already the current active slave.\n",
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	sscanf(buf, "%16s", ifname); /* IFNAMSIZ */
+
+	/* check to see if we are clearing active */
+	if (!strlen(ifname) || buf[0] == '\n') {
+		pr_info("%s: Clearing current active slave.\n",
+			bond->dev->name);
+		bond->curr_active_slave = NULL;
+		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
+		if (strncmp(slave->dev->name, ifname, IFNAMSIZ) == 0) {
+			old_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
+			new_active = slave;
+			if (new_active == old_active) {
+				/* do nothing */
+				pr_info("%s: %s is already the current"
+					" active slave.\n",
+					bond->dev->name,
+					slave->dev->name);
+				goto out;
+			}
+			else {
+				if ((new_active) &&
+				    (old_active) &&
+				    (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_UP) &&
+				    IS_UP(new_active->dev)) {
+					pr_info("%s: Setting %s as active"
+						" slave.\n",
 						bond->dev->name,
 						slave->dev->name);
-					goto out;
+					bond_change_active_slave(bond,
+								 new_active);
 				}
 				else {
-        				if ((new_active) &&
-            				    (old_active) &&
-				            (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_UP) &&
-				            IS_UP(new_active->dev)) {
-						pr_info("%s: Setting %s as active slave.\n",
-							bond->dev->name,
-							slave->dev->name);
-							bond_change_active_slave(bond, new_active);
-        				}
-					else {
-						pr_info("%s: Could not set %s as active slave; either %s is down or the link is down.\n",
-							bond->dev->name,
-							slave->dev->name,
-							slave->dev->name);
-					}
-					goto out;
+					pr_info("%s: Could not set %s as"
+						" active slave; either %s is"
+						" down or the link is down.\n",
+						bond->dev->name,
+						slave->dev->name,
+						slave->dev->name);
 				}
+				goto out;
 			}
 		}
-
-		/* if we got here, then we didn't match the name of any slave */
-
-		if (strlen(buf) == 0 || buf[0] == '\n') {
-			pr_info("%s: Setting active slave to None.\n",
-				bond->dev->name);
-			bond->primary_slave = NULL;
-			bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-		} else {
-			pr_info("%s: Unable to set %.*s as active slave as it is not a slave.\n",
-				bond->dev->name, (int)strlen(buf) - 1, buf);
-		}
 	}
+
+	pr_info("%s: Unable to set %.*s as active slave.\n",
+		bond->dev->name, (int)strlen(buf) - 1, buf);
  out:
 	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 	read_unlock(&bond->lock);
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] bonding: fix string comparison errors
  2011-07-26 21:12 [PATCH net-next v3] bonding: fix string comparison errors Andy Gospodarek
@ 2011-07-28  5:41 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-07-28  5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andy; +Cc: netdev, vitas, fubar, tumeya

From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:12:27 -0400

> When a bond contains a device where one name is the subset of another
> (eth1 and eth10, for example), one cannot properly set the primary
> device or the currently active device.
> 
> This was reported and based on work by Takuma Umeya.  I also verified
> the problem and tested that this fix resolves it.
> 
> V2: A few did not like the the current code or my changes, so I
> refactored bonding_store_primary and bonding_store_active_slave to be a
> bit cleaner, dropped the use of strnicmp since we did not really need
> the comparison to be case insensitive, and formatted the input string
> from sysfs so a comparison to IFNAMSIZ could be used.
> 
> I also discovered an error in bonding_store_active_slave that would
> modify bond->primary_slave rather than bond->curr_active_slave before
> forcing the bonding driver to choose a new active slave.
> 
> V3: Actually sending the proper patch....
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
> Reported-by: Takuma Umeya <tumeya@redhat.com>

Applied.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-28  5:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-26 21:12 [PATCH net-next v3] bonding: fix string comparison errors Andy Gospodarek
2011-07-28  5:41 ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).