From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: "Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"bhutchings@solarflare.com" <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 1/4] pci: Add flag indicating device has been assigned by KVM
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:54:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110729165446.GA6731@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F0755019414D59C@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
> > > > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 15:17 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > > > > Device drivers that create and destroy SR-IOV virtual functions via
> > > > > calls to pci_enable_sriov() and pci_disable_sriov can cause
> > catastrophic
> > > > > failures if they attempt to destroy VFs while they are assigned to
> > > > > guest virtual machines. By adding a flag for use by the KVM module
> > > > > to indicate that a device is assigned a device driver can check that
> > > > > flag and avoid destroying VFs while they are assigned and avoid
> > system
> > > > > failures.
> OK, but I hope Xen can still use the dev_flag assignment bit.
Yeah, I think the attached patch would do it, but I need to double check it.
Do you have a git tree with this patchset?
Um, so you are fixing up ixgbe only - what about the cxgb4 and be driver?
Shouldn't they also get some of this treatment?
diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c
index 206c4ce0..0d72e84 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/xenbus.c
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static int xen_pcibk_export_device(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
goto out;
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "registering for %d\n", pdev->xdev->otherend_id);
+ dev->dev_flags |= PCI_DEV_FLAGS_ASSIGNED;
if (xen_register_device_domain_owner(dev,
pdev->xdev->otherend_id) != 0) {
dev_err(&dev->dev, "device has been assigned to another " \
@@ -289,6 +290,7 @@ static int xen_pcibk_remove_device(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
}
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "unregistering for %d\n", pdev->xdev->otherend_id);
+ dev->dev_flags &= ~PCI_DEV_FLAGS_ASSIGNED;
xen_unregister_device_domain_owner(dev);
xen_pcibk_release_pci_dev(pdev, dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-27 22:17 [RFC net-next PATCH 0/4] Add new settings for ethtool Greg Rose
2011-07-27 22:17 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 1/4] pci: Add flag indicating device has been assigned by KVM Greg Rose
2011-07-28 15:11 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-28 15:58 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-28 16:27 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-28 16:42 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-29 16:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-07-30 4:00 ` Jeff Kirsher
2011-07-29 16:51 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-07-29 16:54 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-27 22:17 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 2/4] ixgbe: Reconfigure SR-IOV Init Greg Rose
2011-07-28 5:26 ` David Miller
2011-07-28 15:44 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-27 22:17 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands Greg Rose
2011-07-28 5:27 ` David Miller
2011-07-28 15:51 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-28 16:14 ` David Miller
2011-07-28 16:21 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-28 21:14 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-07-28 21:16 ` Rose, Gregory V
[not found] ` <539DF151-E442-4375-8777-19676B95059B@qlogic.com>
2011-07-28 20:38 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-28 22:01 ` Anirban Chakraborty
2011-07-28 22:04 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-28 21:20 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-07-28 21:34 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-28 22:04 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-07-28 22:25 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-27 22:18 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: Add support for new ethtool settings Greg Rose
2011-07-28 11:54 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-07-28 15:52 ` Rose, Gregory V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110729165446.GA6731@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregory.v.rose@intel.com \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).